Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Preservative-free Artificial Tears in the Treatment of Neurotrophic Keratitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Karim Mohamed-Noriega
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
  • José Francisco Martinez-Delgado
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
  • Fernando Morales-Wong
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
  • EFREN JOSIMAR GUTIERREZ-ENRIQUEZ
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
  • Jesús Mohamed-Hamsho
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Karim Mohamed-Noriega None; José Francisco Martinez-Delgado None; Fernando Morales-Wong None; EFREN GUTIERREZ-ENRIQUEZ None; Jesús Mohamed-Hamsho None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4112. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Karim Mohamed-Noriega, José Francisco Martinez-Delgado, Fernando Morales-Wong, EFREN JOSIMAR GUTIERREZ-ENRIQUEZ, Jesús Mohamed-Hamsho; Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Preservative-free Artificial Tears in the Treatment of Neurotrophic Keratitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4112.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Platelet-rich autologous plasma (PRP) is a proven therapy for neurotrophic keratitis (NK), however studies on PRP usually focus on severe NK, are non-comparative and often are in combination (COMB) with preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT). The aim is to evaluate if PRP, PFAT or COMB are similar or more effective in treating stage 1 NK. This is a prospective, comparative, randomized, non-blinded cross-over clinical trial (NCT04604834).

Methods : Patients aged 18-years or older with grade 1 NK on Mackie’s scale were enrolled between 2020-2023. Treatment groups began using PFAT, PRP or COMB and were intercrossed every 4 weeks. Intercrossing sequences were PFAT-PRP-COMB, PRP-PFAT-COMB and COMB-PFAT-PRP. Measurements were taken at baseline and at the end of each treatment. Evaluation included corneal sensitivity (CS), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), Schirmer test (ST), Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear breakup time (FBUT), and tear osmolarity (OSM). Paired T test, Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskall-wallis tests were used. Institutional ethics committee approval was received; all participants provided written informed consent.

Results : 50 eyes of 35 patients were included. No baseline significant differences were observed between groups. Mean baseline values in PFAT, PRP and COMB groups were: CS (2.4, 2.5, 2.3), CFS (5.8, 4.8, 5.4), ST(9.9, 11.4, 10.5), OSDI (38.1, 36.2, 34.7), FBUT(4.6, 4.2, 4.5), OSM (310.2, 310.5, 307.2). At 4 weeks before intercrossing all groups had improvement in CS (mean change(std. mean error): PFAT (-0.94(0.027) p=0.032), PRP (-0.68(0.17) p=0.017), COMB (-1.53(0.46) p=0.005); CFS improved only in PFAT (-0.06(0.29) p=0.022); OSDI improved in PFAT (17.1(5.76) p=0.009) and PRP (16.2(5.83) p=0.013); FBUT improved in PRP (-1.67(0.33) p=0.001). Response to treatment from baseline to end visit independently from intercrossing order: CS had improvement in all groups: PFAT(-0.36(0.18) p=0.027), PRP(-0.49(0.19) p=0.019), COMB(-0.64(0.35) p=0.004); CFS improved in PFAT (1.36(0.39) p=0.001) and COMB (0.78(0.33) p=0.024); OSDI improved in PFAT (6.54(2.48) P=0.011) and PRP (8.12(2.71) p=0.004); BCVA. improved in PFAT (0.13(0.06) p=0.031). No differences were observed in OSM.

Conclusions : PRP alone or in combination with PFAT is an effective alternative for patients with stage 1 NK, as it improves corneal sensitivity, corneal staining, and ocular surface symptoms.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×