Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Full-field electroretinography reference limits from 420 healthy subjects, derived from transference and validation of reference data between electrode types and centers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rebecca Baker
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Shaun Leo
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • William Clowes
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Anne Georgiou
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • Isabelle Chow
    St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Xiaofan Jiang
    University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • Omar Abdul Rahman Mahroo
    St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • Antonio Calcagni
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Magella Neveu
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • Anthony G Robson
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Rebecca Baker None; Shaun Leo None; William Clowes None; Anne Georgiou None; Isabelle Chow None; Xiaofan Jiang None; Omar Mahroo None; Antonio Calcagni None; Magella Neveu None; Anthony Robson None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5869. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rebecca Baker, Shaun Leo, William Clowes, Anne Georgiou, Isabelle Chow, Xiaofan Jiang, Omar Abdul Rahman Mahroo, Antonio Calcagni, Magella Neveu, Anthony G Robson; Full-field electroretinography reference limits from 420 healthy subjects, derived from transference and validation of reference data between electrode types and centers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5869.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The objective was to establish age-adjusted reference intervals for the full-field electroretinogram (ERG) recorded with silver thread electrodes.

Methods : Local reference subjects underwent dark-adapted (DA) and light-adapted (LA) ERG testing according to the ISCEV (International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision) Standard, using silver threads in the lower fornix, gold foils, and skin electrodes. Comparison analysis was performed to determine whether reference data was transferable between electrode types, directly or with adjustment. A linear model, fitted to the electrode comparison data (n=52), was used to transform local gold foil ERG reference data for inclusion in the reference sample (n=156). Silver thread ERG reference data from a second center underwent verification for inclusion in the reference sample (n=212). The combined sample of 420 reference individuals (one eye per subject) was used to derive age-adjusted reference limits for timing and amplitude of the main DA 0.01, DA 3, DA 10, LA 30Hz and LA 3 ERG components.

Results : There was no significant difference in ERG amplitude or peak time between the centers (p>0.05). Silver thread and gold foil ERG amplitudes and peak times were correlated (r2 ranged from 0.68 - 0.98). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no clinically significant bias in gold foil and silver thread ERG peak time (≤1.5ms for all ERG components), with LA 30Hz peak time showing the highest agreement (bias: -0.2ms, 95% limits of agreement (LOA): -1.1 to 0.7ms, ‘silver thread - gold foil’). There was a clinically significant amplitude difference between electrode types: silver thread ERGs were 55 – 65% the amplitude of gold foil ERGs (LOA ranged from 29 – 90%) and skin ERGs were around 35% the amplitude of silver thread ERGs (LOA ranged from 18 – 54%). Pooling of reference data provided a sufficient sample covering 8 decades, from which age-adjusted reference limits were calculated.

Conclusions : Reference ERG data recorded according to the ISCEV Standard may be transferred from one electrode type to another and between centers, following verification. The study highlights the potential of developing large and robust ERG reference ranges, pertinent to standardization, clinical management, and multi-center studies.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×