Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparison of Ocular Irritation Associated with the Use of Hard and Soft Corneal ERG Electrodes.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shresta Patangay
    RetMap, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Mary Flynn Roberts
    Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Michael A Chaglasian
    Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • John R Hetling
    RetMap, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Shresta Patangay RetMap, Inc. , Code E (Employment); Mary Flynn Roberts RetMap, Inc. , Code F (Financial Support); Michael Chaglasian RetMap, Inc. , Code F (Financial Support); John Hetling RetMap, Inc. , Code O (Owner), RetMap, Inc, Code P (Patent), RetMap, Inc. , Code S (non-remunerative)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5851. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shresta Patangay, Mary Flynn Roberts, Michael A Chaglasian, John R Hetling; Comparison of Ocular Irritation Associated with the Use of Hard and Soft Corneal ERG Electrodes.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5851.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Electroretinogram (ERG) protocols vary in test duration, from less than 10 min to more than 30 min (e.g. some research protocols). During installation, wear and removal of corneal ERG electrodes, relative motion between the electrode and the eye can cause irritation. Here we compare four measures of irritation associated with the use of two similar ERG electrodes, one made primarily of hard plastic (ERG-Jet) and one made primarily of soft silicone (RM Electrode®).

Methods : The ERG-Jet and RM Electrode® are both contact lens corneal ERG electrodes that include integral features meant to keep the eye lids open during testing. All study participants (n=10) were healthy adults with normal vision and no recent history of corneal disease or medical procedures (e.g. LASIK). Each subject underwent baseline assessment of bulbar, limbal and tarsal redness and corneal staining (to visualize corneal abrasions) of both eyes using standard grading scales. Following administration of one drop of proparacaine HCl 0.5% in each eye, one electrode type was installed in each eye. After 20, 40 and 60 minutes of wear, during which the participant watched a video, the electrodes were removed, and eyes evaluated. Prior to reinstallation at 20 and 40 minutes, one drop of proparacaine was readministered in each eye. Corneal staining was evaluated at baseline and 60 minutes only.

Results : Prior to ERG electrode installation, there was no difference in any measure between left and right eyes (i.e. between electrode types, paired t-test). After 20 min of wear, limbal redness was significantly higher in eyes wearing the hard electrode type (p=0.003). After 40 and 60 min of wear, limbal and bulbar redness were significantly higher in eyes wearing the hard electrode type (p<0.005 for all comparisons). At 60 min, the corneal staining was significantly higher for eyes wearing the hard electrode type (p=0.003). There was no difference in tarsal redness between eyes (electrode types) at any time point (p>0.3).

Conclusions : For ERG testing where a corneal contact lens electrode is preferred, irritation can be reduced by using an electrode made primarily of a soft silicone. Differences in irritation were observed after 20 minutes of wear and increased with total wear time and removal/reinstallation cycles. This study included an extreme wear period of 60 total minutes which may be relevant to some extended research protocols.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×