Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Feasibility of external imaging using a non-mydriatic robotic fundus camera
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sarah Armstrong
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Juan Arias
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Jessica Menou
    New View Optometric Center, La Mesa, California, United States
  • David Kasanoff
    New View Optometric Center, La Mesa, California, United States
  • Nevin W. El-Nimri
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sarah Armstrong Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Juan Arias Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Jessica Menou None; David Kasanoff Topcon Healthcare, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Nevin El-Nimri Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5545. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sarah Armstrong, Juan Arias, Jessica Menou, David Kasanoff, Nevin W. El-Nimri; Feasibility of external imaging using a non-mydriatic robotic fundus camera. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5545.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the clinical usefulness of external images acquired with a fundus camera.

Methods : Subjects with and without external eye conditions were referred by a local eye clinic. Images were acquired on the NW500 (Topcon Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) using the manual photography mode. The manual focus bar was adjusted to place focus where the iris meets the pupil or placed on pathology when applicable. All images were captured in a well-illuminated room without dilation. An experienced image grader determined the clinical usefulness using a 5-point grading scale (with 1 as the lowest and 5 as the highest). Additionally, images were graded for focus quality using the same 5-point grading scale.

Results : 28 eyes of 14 subjects were imaged. The demographics of the subjects were as follows: mean age was 45 years (range 20-74); majority female (57%); majority White (64% White, 21% Asian, and 14% Black). Both normal and diseased eyes were recruited for this study. 57% of subjects were identified as positive for external eye conditions including Salzmann’s Nodular Degeneration, Radial Keratotomy Scars, Superficial Punctate Keratitis, Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy, Corneal Pannus, Lid lesion x2, and Keratoconus x2.

During image acquisition using the manual photography mode, the manual focus bar was adjusted for each subject to place focus where the iris meets the pupil or placed on pathology when applicable. As described in Table 1, the overall average image quality score for clinical usefulness of external images was 4.0/5.0 and the focus quality grade was 3.9/5.0. In subjects with external eye conditions, the average image quality score for clinical usefulness was 3.8 and the focus grade was 3.6. In normal subjects, the average image quality score for clinical usefulness was 4.3 and the focus grade was 4.3.

Conclusions : The results indicate that a non-mydriatic robotic fundus camera is capable of acquiring clinically useful and in focus external ocular images using manual photography mode in both diseased and normal eyes.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×