Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
What is the most reproducible anatomical OCT parameter
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yasseen Amellal
    Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
  • Maide Gozde Inam
    Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, New York, United States
  • Doru Gucer
    Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, New York, United States
  • Onur Inam
    Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, New York, United States
  • Tongalp H Tezel
    Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yasseen Amellal None; Maide Gozde Inam None; Doru Gucer None; Onur Inam None; Tongalp Tezel None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Supported by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, NY, Foley Research Fund, New York, NY.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5494. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yasseen Amellal, Maide Gozde Inam, Doru Gucer, Onur Inam, Tongalp H Tezel; What is the most reproducible anatomical OCT parameter. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5494.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To determine the most reliable anatomical structure dimensions that can be used for size estimations on OCT.

Methods : Six-mm horizontal central OCT images of 100 healthy eyes of 100 patients were captured using Heidelberg Spectralis OCT. Using the central horizontal scan to bisect the fovea, thicknesses of the ellipsoid zone (EZ), photoreceptor outer segment zone (POS), interdigitation zone (IZ), cone outer segment termination zone (COST), retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch membrane complex (RPE/Bruch) were manually measured at points 500 µm away from the center of the fovea in the temporal (T500) and nasal (N500) regions. Mean value and its standard deviation for each zone was calculated. Coefficient of variation ranks were used to determine the anatomical dimension that reveals the least variation among individuals.

Results : Mean age of the participants was 59 ± 17 years. T500 region measurements of EZ, POS, IZ, COST and RPE/Bruch layers had a mean and standard deviation of 21 ± 2.6 µm, 11 ± 3.0 µm, 14 ± 3.1 µm, 7.4 ± 1.9 µm, 18.1 ± 4.8 µm, respectively. N500 region measurements revealed similar ranking with measurements of 21 ± 2.5 µm, 11 ± 2.5 µm, 14.2 ± 3.1 µm, 7.5 ± 2.0 µm, 18.1 ± 4.5 µm, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed low coefficient variation for EZ line thickness at both the T500 region (0.12 for EZ, 0.26 for POS, 0.22 for IZ, 0.25 COST, and 0.26 for RPE/Bruch membrane) and N500 region (0.12 for EZ, 0.22 for POS, 0.22 for IZ, 0.27 for COST, and 0.25 for RPE/Bruch membrane).

Conclusions : The lowest coefficient variation value at both the T500 and N500 points is the thickness of the EZ line. Thus, EZ thickness can reliably be used to estimate the dimensions of anatomical structures detected on OCT scan.These findings could help standardize physician retinal layer analysis on OCT, which may enhance diagnostic accuracy.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×