Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Visual acuity measured at various chart distances versus defocus curves
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Henk A Weeber
    R&D, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Netherlands
  • Srividhya Vilupuru
    Johnson & Johnson Vision, California, United States
  • Carmen Canovas
    R&D, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Netherlands
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Henk Weeber Johnson & Johnson Vision, Code E (Employment); Srividhya Vilupuru Johnson & Johnson Vision, Code E (Employment); Carmen Canovas Johnson & Johnson Vision, Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5453. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Henk A Weeber, Srividhya Vilupuru, Carmen Canovas; Visual acuity measured at various chart distances versus defocus curves. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5453.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To explore potential differences between visual acuity measured at various chart distances versus defocus testing using minus lenses.

Methods : Defocus testing (VAdef) using minus lenses and visual acuity measurements with ETDRS charts at distance (VAchart), intermediate and near were conducted on 25 subjects with healthy phakic eyes. The mean age was 45.8 ± 14.7 years, range: 22 to 80. In addition, data on visual acuity measured at various chart distances versus defocus testing using minus lenses was collected from publicly available sources of patients implanted with marketed presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Regression analysis was performed on these two datasets. Visual acuity was processed in logMAR units.

Results : For the 25 subjects, visual acuity measured at various chart distances versus defocus testing using minus lenses correlated linearly by VAchart=-0.004 + 0.813*VAdef (R2=0.811).
The public data from pseudophakic eyes consisted of data from 5 clinical trials, spanning 5 presbyopia correcting lens models and accompanying monofocal control eyes. Patient outcomes were pooled so that the correlation is based on average VAs. These data provided a linear correlation characterized by VAchart=-0.002 + 0.801*VAdef (R2=0.967). However, the 95% prediction interval was approximately ±0.1 logMAR.
These outcomes indicate that when visual acuity is good (close to 0.0 logMAR), on average both methods provide essentially the same result. When visual acuity is suboptimal (e.g. 0.2 logMAR or worse) VAdef is worse than VAchart. Prediction intervals were large, which makes the correlation less useful for prediction VAchart from VAdef and vice versa.

Conclusions : VA measured at various chart distances and VA obtained from defocus testing using minus lenses correlate well on average but suffer a large prediction error, which makes the correlation less useful for prediction VAchart from VAdef and vice versa.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×