Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Short-term adaptation to simulated multifocal lenses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Eduardo Esteban-Ibañez
    Instituto de Óptica “Daza de Valdés”, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IO-CSIC), Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
    2EyesVision SL, Tres Cantos, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
  • Victor Rodriguez-Lopez
    Instituto de Óptica “Daza de Valdés”, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IO-CSIC), Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
  • Enrique Gambra
    2EyesVision SL, Tres Cantos, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
  • Carlos Dorronsoro
    Instituto de Óptica “Daza de Valdés”, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IO-CSIC), Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
    2EyesVision SL, Tres Cantos, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
  • Susana Marcos
    Instituto de Óptica “Daza de Valdés”, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IO-CSIC), Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
    Center for Visual Science, The Institute of Optics, Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Eduardo Esteban-Ibañez 2EyesViision SL, Code E (Employment); Victor Rodriguez-Lopez None; Enrique Gambra 2EyesViision SL, Code E (Employment), 2EyesViision SL, Code I (Personal Financial Interest); Carlos Dorronsoro 2EyesViision SL, Code E (Employment), 2EyesViision SL, Code I (Personal Financial Interest), 2EyesViision SL, Code P (Patent); Susana Marcos 2EyesViision SL, Code I (Personal Financial Interest), 2EyesViision SL, Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Industrial PhD Grant (IND2020/BMD‑17442) to EEI; AEI grant CPP2021-008388 and La Caixa Fundation ID100010432 LCF/BQ/DR19/11740032 to VRL; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain (CPP2021-008388) to EG and CD; NIH Grant EY035009, NIH P30 Core Grant EY001319-46 and Unrestricted Grant Research to Prevent Blindness to SM.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5436. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Eduardo Esteban-Ibañez, Victor Rodriguez-Lopez, Enrique Gambra, Carlos Dorronsoro, Susana Marcos; Short-term adaptation to simulated multifocal lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5436.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Debate exists on the extent to which patients adapt to Multifocal lenses operating by Simultaneous Vision (SV). Using a SV simulator we investigated short-term adaptation aftereffects to generic and commercial SV lens designs, and their dependency on Multifocal Intraocular Lens and Contact Lens (MIOL & MCL) design parameters, including energy balance between foci and near addition (NA).

Methods : A commercial binocular SV simulator (SimVis Gekko, 2EyesVision) simulated adapting conditions and blur test sequences, in 2 psychophysical experiments (Exp1 & 2), where patients adapted to and judged perceived quality of a face stimulus (4x4° on a monitor @2m). In Exp1 a QUEST paradigm (20 trials; 2AFC task; sharp or blurred image) determined the Shift in Perceived Degradation Threshold (SPDT, i.e. % far energy in a bifocal lens to perceive blur neutrality) after each adaptation. In Exp2, subjects provided perceptual scores (PS, 0-10; 5 trials). Adapting conditions were a monofocal lens (MF), 3 generic bifocal lenses with different energy % for Far(F)/Near(N): 75F/25N, 50F/50N & 25F/75N with 5 NA (0.5-3D; Exp1) and 4 commercial lenses: Trifocal diffractive IOL (FV), EDoF IOL (VV), and center near Low (MDL) and High NA (MDH) refractive MCLs (Exp1 & 2). Exp1 & 2 were conducted on 6 subjects (29.7±5.2yo). Initial adaptation period was 60s (3s re-adaptation during trials), and test image response time was 0.5s. Matlab & PsychToolbox synchronized sequences of SV lenses and stimulus.

Results : All tested SV lenses produced adaptation aftereffects compared to MF in Exp1 & 2. In Exp1, the largest SPDT aftereffects were produced by 25F/75N (29.1±11.4%), MDH (27.7±13.1%) and 0.5D NA (31.1±13.9%). Energy % and NA significantly influenced aftereffects measured by SPDT (F=11.6, p<0.01 & F=11.4, p<0.01; mixed linear model analysis). Different energy % induced significant adaptation aftereffects for 0.75 and 1.5D NA (p<0.01). Exp2 revealed significant shifts for MDH (2.7±2.2PS) and FV (2.0±1.2PS) with 1.5 and 3D NA test images (averaged across F/N distributions).

Conclusions : The largest short-term adaptation aftereffects result from lenses with highest % energy at near and lower NA and occurred also with commercial designs though the interaction between these parameters varied individually. Adaptation is most effective on test images with matching NA magnitudes, highlighting the impact of lens design on both visual function and adaptation to optimize outcomes.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×