Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Area under the response waveform following the b-wave peak and its relationship to oscillatory potential amplitude
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sara Safari
    University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States
  • Jan J Kremers
    Section for Retinal Physiology, Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Radouil T Tzekov
    Department of Medical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sara Safari None; Jan Kremers None; Radouil Tzekov None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5387. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sara Safari, Jan J Kremers, Radouil T Tzekov; Area under the response waveform following the b-wave peak and its relationship to oscillatory potential amplitude. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5387.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To explore how the photopic negative response (PhNR), measured as the area under the response waveform, is correlated to the oscillatory potentials (OP) amplitude and the amplitude of other major ERG components.

Methods : A retrospective chart review and data analysis of patients aged 18 and older undergoing routine ERG testing at USF Eye Institute (Tampa, FL) was conducted. LA3 was recorded using a ~2.5 cd●s/m2 white flash on a 30 cd/m2 white background with fiber electrodes. For OP extraction, the signal was filtered using high-pass 8th order Butterworth filter with 58Hz cut-off frequency. The root mean square (RMS) of the filtered signal was calculated to define the OP amplitude. The OP RMS values were compared by linear regression to the area under the curve (AUC) of the waveform response in 4 fixed time windows (5, 10, 15 and 20 ms starting at the b-wave peak) and one variable time window starting at the b-wave peak and ending at the trough between the b-wave and i-wave, referred to as PhNR1. As an additional analysis, we compared the AUC in different time windows to a- and b-wave amplitudes and to PhNR1 amplitude.

Results : ERG recordings of 70 patients/135 eyes (52F/18M, average age: 49.2 ± 15.3 years) were evaluated. The AUCs were ranked by R2 values and the ranking order was as follows: 10ms AUC and 15ms AUC (range 0.9257-0.9291; 0.9208-0.9339, respectively), 20ms AUC (0.8515-0.8703), 5 ms AUC (0.8187-0.8205) and PhNR1 AUC (0.6833-0.7027). When AUC were compared to b-wave amplitudes instead of OP, the R2 values were generally smaller, although the ranking was similar: 15 ms (0.90-0.92), 20 ms (0.88-0.89), 10 ms (0.84-0.86), PhNR1 (0.73-0.79) and 5 ms (0.71-0.72). The R2 values were even lower with a-wave amplitude showing similar ranking: 15 ms (0.75-0.79), 20 ms (0.76-0.77), 10 ms (0.73-0.75) PhNR1 (0.63-0.64) and 5 ms (0.63-0.63). PhNR1 amplitude vs AUC R2 values were even higher than either a- or b-wave amplitude (range 0.77-0.97) showing similar ranking pattern.

Conclusions : Overall, our results demonstrate that the AUC restricted to 15 or 20 ms time windows is better correlated to the OP or PhNR1 AUC vs. traditionally measured major ERG components like a- and b-wave. This could allow using this parameter as a measure of inner retinal function in clinical settings.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×