Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Evaluating rates of functional vs. cosmetic blepharoplasty following dermatochalasis referral
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Daniel Hu
    Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
    Ophthalmology, Lifespan Health System, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
  • Philip Rizzuto
    Ophthalmology, Lifespan Health System, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
    Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Daniel Hu None; Philip Rizzuto None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5215. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Daniel Hu, Philip Rizzuto; Evaluating rates of functional vs. cosmetic blepharoplasty following dermatochalasis referral. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5215.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose :
Indications for blepharoplasty (bleph)may be categorized as “functional” or “cosmetic”. In the US, patients electing to proceed with functional blephs must demonstrate significant compromise of daily living activities due to visual impairment in order to qualify for insurance coverage. Patients who do not meet these requirements can elect to pay for the bleph, as it is considered cosmetic. The purpose of this study is to characterize the nature of the dermatochalasis evaluation (eval), indications for surgery, and subsequent functional vs. cosmetic bleph.

Methods : A retrospective chart review was conducted from a single oculoplastic surgeon in the US. CPT (diagnosis code) was used to identify patients seen for dermatochalasis eval between 1/2019-1/2023. The primary outcome measure was whether the patient elected to proceed with functional or cosmetic bleph. Additional variables collected include indications for bleph, age (stratified 20-39, 40-59, and >/=60), gender, and race/ethnicity.

Results : 608 patients were seen for a dermatochalasis eval between 2019-2023. 243 (40%) patients then elected to proceed with surgery. Of these, 196 (81%) patients received cosmetic bleph. 47 (19%) patients received functional bleph. Neither age nor gender were reliable predictors of whether patients elected to proceed with surgery (p>0.5). Of patients who did receive surgery, age was a significant predictor of whether the bleph was functional vs. cosmetic (p<0.001), and gender was not (p=0.364).

Conclusions : The data show that the majority (60%) of dermatochalasis evals did not lead to bleph. The rate of evaluation leading to surgery may be partially explained by a discrepancy in the understanding of insurance coverage between patient, referring provider, and surgeon. False expectations of insurance coverage for both initial eval and subsequent surgery may result in an excess number of evals as well as associated out-of-pocket expenses for patients. Both patients and referring providers should be aware of the insurance requirements for functional blephs.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×