Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Area Under The Curve Visual Acuity Following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair with Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Pars Plana Vitrectomy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sueellen Demian
    ophthalmology and visual sciences -St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto-Oakville, Ontario, Canada
  • Rajeev Hemant Muni
    ophthalmology and visual sciences -St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto-Oakville, Ontario, Canada
  • Aurora Pecaku
    ophthalmology and visual sciences -St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto-Oakville, Ontario, Canada
  • Ryan S. Huang
    University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Pamela Tan
    ophthalmology and visual sciences -St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto-Oakville, Ontario, Canada
  • Andrew Mihalache
    University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sueellen Demian None; Rajeev Muni Alcon, Apellis, AbbVie, Bayer, Bausch Health, Roche, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Alcon, AbbVie, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Code F (Financial Support), PSI Foundation, Fighting Blindness Canada, Code F (Financial Support); Aurora Pecaku None; Ryan S. Huang None; Pamela Tan None; Andrew Mihalache None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None : MMP: Financial support (to institution) – PSI Foundation, Fighting Blindness Canada. RHM: Consultant - Alcon, Apellis, AbbVie, Bayer, Bausch Health, Roche; Financial Support (to institution) - Alcon, AbbVie, Bayer, Novartis, Roche.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 6482. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sueellen Demian, Rajeev Hemant Muni, Aurora Pecaku, Ryan S. Huang, Pamela Tan, Andrew Mihalache; Area Under The Curve Visual Acuity Following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair with Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Pars Plana Vitrectomy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):6482.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : A Retrospective cohort study was performed to describe the postoperative longitudinal visual acuity (VA) following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair with pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) versus pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) by assessing area under curve visual acuity.

Methods : 1000 patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment presenting to St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, from October 2009 to May 2023, were assessed for their visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP) and fundus examination at baseline, postoperative day 1, week 1, months 1,3,6 and 12 respectively. Patients with vision loss >3 months, PVR > grade B, a demarcation line, and previous history of retinal pathology or intervention were excluded. Visual acuity was plotted against time to represent the area under the curve for vision over the course of 1 year.

Results : 68.8% (661/961) were male with a mean age of 60.35 ± 11.38 years old.
59.1% (557/961) were phakic and 55.4% (531 /961 )had a fovea involving RRD at presentation. The mean presenting logMAR visual acuity was 0.96(SD 0.9 ) in the PnR group vs 1.12(SD 1.24) in PPV (P=0.7). 80.7% (774/1000) of patients underwent PnR and 19.3 % 185/1000 had PPV.

On day 1, LogMAR visual acuity was 0.754 ± 0.778 in the PnR group versus 2.565 ± 0.662 in the PPV group (p<0.001). At one week the PnR group had a LogMAR VA of 0.599 ± 0.657, while the PPV group had a LogMAR VA of 1.901 ± 0.957,(p< 0.001). LogMAR visual acuity at one month was 0.570 ± 0.681 in the PnR group and 0.717 ± 0.705 in the PPV group (P=0.023). At the three-month postoperative evaluation, LogMAR VA was 0.392 ± 0.474 in the PnR group compared to 0.443 ± 0.463 in the PPV group (p<0.001). At 6 months visual acuity was 0.369 ± 0.455 in the PnR group vs 0.448 ± 0.411 in the PPV group (p<0.001). At one year , patients treated with PnR had a LogMar VA of 0.344 ± 0.438 vs 0.286 ± 0.380 in those treated with PPV. P=0.2. The area Area Under the Curve visual acuity was 0.404 in the PnR group vs 0.518 in the PPV group which was statistically significant.

Conclusions : Area under the curve visual acuity provides a longitudinal evaluation of a patient's overall outcome during the course of the study. This study demonstrates how patients undergoing PnR exhibit a faster recovery of visual acuity and have overall improved mean visual acuity over the course of the first year post-operatively.
.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×