Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Humphrey Field Test vs. Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in Latin American Normal and Glaucoma Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Emiliano Teran
    Deparment of Physics, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa Facultad de Ciencias Fisico Matematicas, Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico
    Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias de la Salud - Unidad Santo Tomas, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Mexico city, Mexico city, Mexico
  • Efrain Romo-García
    Deparment of Opthalmology, Hospital Buena Vista, Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico
  • Miguel Angel Cano-Quevedo
    Deparment of Opthalmology, Hospital Buena Vista, Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico
  • Omar Garcia-Lievanos
    Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias de la Salud - Unidad Santo Tomas, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Mexico city, Mexico city, Mexico
  • Pablo De Gracia
    School of Optometry, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Emiliano Teran None; Efrain Romo-García None; Miguel Angel Cano-Quevedo None; Omar Garcia-Lievanos None; Pablo De Gracia None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 6352. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Emiliano Teran, Efrain Romo-García, Miguel Angel Cano-Quevedo, Omar Garcia-Lievanos, Pablo De Gracia; Humphrey Field Test vs. Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in Latin American Normal and Glaucoma Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):6352.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Humphrey Field Test (HFT) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements in detecting glaucoma within a Latin American population.

Methods : In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 14 individuals (2 men, 12 women), aged 51-67, comprising 10 with normal vision (mean deviation > -6.0 on HFT) and 4 with glaucoma. Exclusions were made for those with conditions affecting visual field or RNFL measurements. RNFL thickness was measured using Heidelberg Spectralis OCT, and HFT followed the Zeiss Humphrey Field Analyzer's SITA Std 24-2 protocol for both eyes. We assessed RNFL across seven sectors (superior, superior temporal, nasal, inferior temporal, inferior, inferior nasal, and temporal) and used t-tests to compare these sectors and visual field index between normal vision and glaucoma groups.

Results : In the normal vision group, HFT mean deviation was -2.0 (95% CI: -2.98 to -1.02 dB), while the glaucoma group had -18.6 (95% CI: -26.10 to -11.11 dB). Visual field index significantly differed between groups (t = 3.7, p = 0.005). RNFL analysis showed non-significant differences in several sectors: superior (t=1.13, p=0.235), superior nasal (t=0.95, p=0.372), nasal (t=1.23, p=0.253), temporal inferior (t=1.15, p=0.28), and temporal (t=2.11, p=0.0602). Temporal superior sector had a non-significant difference (t=0.580, p=0.579). Most variables followed a Gaussian distribution, except nasal inferior and central sectors in the glaucoma group. Linear mixed models identified significant relationships between mean deviation and glaucoma-related RNFL sectors, notably central (Chi2 = 9.3605, p=0.001) and nasal (Chi2=14.5952, p<0.001), as well as significant correlations with the visual field index. <div> </div>

Conclusions : Our findings suggest HFT's potential use in detecting glaucoma in a Latin American population, as evidenced by significant mean deviation differences between normal vision and glaucoma groups (t=5.36, p<0.001). Linear mixed models identified associations, especially in central (Chi2 = 9.3605, p=0.001) and nasal (Chi2=14.5952, p<0.001) RNFL sectors. Visual field index correlated with RNFL sectors in glaucomatous subjects. However, non-statistically significant differences in certain RNFL sectors between normal and glaucoma groups may impact the applicability of HFT and RNFL for glaucoma assessment in this population.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×