Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) in the phase 3 Pagoda and Pavilion trials
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dominic Heinrich
    F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Swaziland
  • Jeremy D. Wolfe
    Associated Retinal Consultants, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
  • Dilsher Dhoot
    California Retina Consultants, Santa Barbara, California, United States
  • Han Ting Ding
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Suk-Joon Hyung
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Paul Latkany
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Katie F. Maass
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Salman Rahman
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Joy C. Hsu
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Dominic Heinrich F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Code E (Employment); Jeremy Wolfe AbbVie, Alcon, Apellis, Genentech, Inc., Regeneron, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Aviceda, Caeregen, Vortex, Code I (Personal Financial Interest); Dilsher Dhoot Alimera, Allergan, Apellis, Bausch + Lomb, Bayer, Coherus, EyePoint, Genentech, Inc., Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Regeneron, Regenxbio, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Outlook, Vortex, Code I (Personal Financial Interest); Han Ting Ding Genentech, Inc., Code E (Employment); Suk-Joon Hyung Genentech, Inc., Code E (Employment); Paul Latkany Genentech, Inc., Code E (Employment); Katie Maass Genentech, Inc., Code E (Employment); Salman Rahman Genentech, Inc., Code E (Employment); Joy Hsu Genentech, Inc., Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, provided support for the study and participated in the study design; conducting the study; and data collection, management, and interpretation.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 6234. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dominic Heinrich, Jeremy D. Wolfe, Dilsher Dhoot, Han Ting Ding, Suk-Joon Hyung, Paul Latkany, Katie F. Maass, Salman Rahman, Joy C. Hsu; Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) in the phase 3 Pagoda and Pavilion trials. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):6234.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To characterize the PK profile of ranibizumab 100 mg/mL administered via the PDS (a drug delivery system that includes an ocular implant for continuous delivery of a customized formulation of ranibizumab) in the phase 3 Pagoda trial (NCT04108156; n=634) for diabetic macular edema (DME) and phase 3 Pavilion trial (NCT04503551; n=174) for diabetic retinopathy (DR) without center-involved diabetic macular edema.

Methods : Pagoda compared the PDS with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (PDS Q24W) vs intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections every 4 weeks (RBZ Q4W). Pavilion compared the PDS with fixed refill-exchanges every 36 weeks (PDS Q36W) vs control (clinical monitoring plus supplemental intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg as required). Before PDS implantation, patients received loading doses of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections Q4W. Serum PK and optional aqueous humor (AH) samples were collected at predefined timepoints in both trials. Results presented are for the PK-evaluable populations. Ranibizumab concentrations were measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (lower limits of quantitation: 15 pg/mL (Pagoda) and 30 pg/mL (Pavilion) for serum, and 20,000 pg/mL for AH).

Results : In Pagoda, PDS Q24W geometric mean (coefficient of variation %) serum ranibizumab concentrations (n=53) at 4 weeks (w) and 24w following implantation were 360 (62.5%) and 262 (47.7%) pg/mL, respectively. AH ranibizumab concentration (n=18) at 24w following implantation was 1.06 (526%) µg/mL and at 12w following first refill-exchange was 2.77 (18.9%) µg/mL. PDS Q24W serum concentrations were below the maximum experienced 1–5 days after a loading dose (1070 [502.9%] pg/mL). PDS Q24W serum and AH concentrations following implantation were above RBZ Q4W trough concentrations (Ctrough) (serum, n=53; AH, n=19) at 4w and 40w (serum, 62.4 [318.6%] and 39.4 [302.8%] pg/mL, respectively; AH, 0.428 [281.2%] and 0.568 [876.9%] µg/mL, respectively).
In Pavilion, PDS Q36W serum ranibizumab concentrations (n=24) at 4w, 24w, and 36w following implantation were 383 (71.3%), 213 (38.3%), and 143 (74.2%) pg/mL, respectively.

Conclusions : PDS continuously released ranibizumab at steady concentrations above intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injection Ctrough over Q24W and Q36W refill intervals. Thus, the PK exposure range with PDS treatment is consistent between trials for DME and DR.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×