Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 9
July 2024
Volume 65, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference Abstract  |   July 2024
Quantitative Ultrasonography of Vitreous – imaging the invisible
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Sebag
    Ophthalmology, VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, California, United States
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States
  • Justin H Nguyen
    Ophthalmology, VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, California, United States
  • Jonathan Mamou
    Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
  • Kenneth Yee
    Ophthalmology, VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, California, United States
  • Ashley Burchfield
    Ophthalmology, VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, California, United States
  • Cameron Hoerig
    Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
  • Ronald H Silverman
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
  • Alfredo A. Sadun
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California, United States
  • Jeffrey A. Ketterling
    Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   J. Sebag, ALCON (C), LumiBird (C), MacuHealth (C), Roche (C), Twenty-Twenty (C), Weill Cornell Medicine (P); Justin Nguyen, None; Jonathan Mamou, Weill Cornell Medicine (P); Kenneth Yee, None; Ashley Burchfield, None; Cameron Hoerig, None; Ronald Silverman, Columbia (P); Alfredo Sadun, None; Jeffrey Ketterling, Well Cornell Medicine (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  VMR Research Foundation (JHN, JS) and NIH grant EB032082 (JS, JM, CH, JAK)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2024, Vol.65, PP0022. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Sebag, Justin H Nguyen, Jonathan Mamou, Kenneth Yee, Ashley Burchfield, Cameron Hoerig, Ronald H Silverman, Alfredo A. Sadun, Jeffrey A. Ketterling; Quantitative Ultrasonography of Vitreous – imaging the invisible. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(9):PP0022.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Vitreous plays several important roles, including maintaining optical clarity within the eye. However, vitreous opacities develop in myopia and with aging that cause floaters and also degrade contrast sensitivity (CS), a condition called Vision Degrading Myodesopsia [Sebag J: Progr Ret Eye Res 2020 Nov;79:100847]. Managing this and other vitreous diseases is hindered by the lack of good ways to image vitreous. Quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) was developed to image and quantify vitreous density as an index of opacification.

Methods : QUS (Mamou et al: IOVS 56:1611–17, 2015) was performed with clinical instruments (AVISO & ABSolu, Quantel Medical, France) to calculate 4 parameters: Energy (E) ≡ sum of the square of the acoustic values within the region of interest (ROI) divided by the ROI area; Mean (M) ≡ acoustic values divided by the ROI size; P50 ≡ percentage of the ROI filled by clusters of echogenic regions >50 pixels or 0.069 mm; QUS Composite (QUSc) = (½ E) + (10 x M) + (100 x P50). Findings were correlated with contrast sensitivity (CS) measured with the Freiburg Acuity Contrast Test (increasing Weber Threshold = worse CS), and patient reported outcomes (PROs) using the NEI VFQ-25.

There were 35 asymptomatic controls and 752 VDM cases of different etiologies (328 posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), 168 myopic vitreopathy (MV), 256 MV+PVD) that were evaluated with QUS. Imaging results were correlated with PROs and CS.

Results : Compared to asymptomatic controls, VDM patients had 63% greater vitreous echodensity (553 ± 132 vs. 904 ± 391 AU, p<0.001). There was a strong correlation between QUSc and CS (R = 0.5497, p<0.00001) as well as between QUSc and VFQ-25 (R = -0.40, p<0.00001). Patients with MV+PVD had worse QUS, CS, and VFQ-25 than other subgroups. The most informative QUS parameter was composite QUSc, with R > 0.55 in all subgroup analyses. QUSc was 81% greater in 321 patients who chose vitrectomy than 430 electing observation. Post-op, QUSc decreased by 66% (p<0.001).

Conclusions : Increasing vitreous echodensity is associated with worse contrast sensitivity and patient dissatisfaction with vision. QUS enables enhanced vitreous imaging that correlates with CS degradation and patient discontent, making it useful for patient evaluation and management. QUS also provides an objective, quantitative outcome measure for new and existing therapies. QUS thus enables imaging of a structure that no longer remains invisible.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference, held in Seattle, WA, May 4, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×