We next performed multi-parameter flow cytometry to explore how
Adrb2 deletion in MDMs impacted macrophage heterogeneity. We subjected 10- to 12-week-old
Adrb2ΔMacs and
Adrb2flox mice to tamoxifen treatment two days before and at the time of laser injury. Eyes were collected on day 3 post-laser and posterior eye cups (retina and choroid-RPE-sclera complex) were isolated and processed for multi-parameter flow cytometry analysis. After multiplet exclusion, live cells were gated forward (
Fig. 5a, top left). From live, single cells, CD45
+ cells were identified (
Fig. 5a, bottom left). We captured mononuclear phagocytes by CD11b
+Lineage
neg staining, excluding B cells (B220), T cells (CD4, CD8), eosinophils (SiglecF), neutrophils (Ly6G), and NK cells (NK1.1) in the Lineage cocktail (
Fig. 5a, middle top). CD64 staining was used to identify CD64
+ macrophages (
Fig. 5a, middle bottom). From CD64
+ cells, microglia were identified as Cx3cr1
highCD45
dim (
Fig. 5a, top right). CD64
+ cells that were not identified as microglia were delineated into Ly6C
+CD11c
neg, Ly6C
+CD11c
+, Ly6C
negCD11c
+, or Ly6C
negCD11c
neg macrophages (
Fig. 5a, bottom right). Microglia numbers were not increased by laser in
Adrb2flox controls, but had a 1.5-fold (
P < 0.05) increase by laser in
Adrb2ΔMacs mice (
Fig. 5b). We found no significant change in number of Ly6C
+CD11c
neg macrophages by laser in either group (
Fig. 5c). In contrast, laser injury increased Ly6C
+CD11c
+ macrophage numbers in
Adrb2flox controls by 4.7-fold (
P < 0.01) and
Adrb2ΔMacs mice by 3.2-fold (
P < 0.05), with no significant difference between laser groups (
Fig. 5d). Similarly, Ly6C
negCD11c
+ macrophage numbers were increased with laser by 2.4-fold (
P < 0.01) in
Adrb2flox controls and 1.8-fold (
P < 0.05) in
Adrb2ΔMacs mice with no significant difference between laser groups (
Fig. 5e). Finally, the number of Ly6C
negCD11c
neg macrophages were both increased with laser in
Adrb2flox controls and
Adrb2ΔMacs mice (
P < 0.05 for both,
Fig. 5f). Interestingly, laser-treated
Adrb2ΔMacs posterior eye cups showed 1.4-fold greater numbers of Ly6C
negCD11c
neg macrophages compared to laser-treated
Adrb2flox posterior eye cups (
P < 0.05,
Fig. 5f). Since we previously showed that CD11c
+ macrophages are pro-angiogenic,
29,30 these results suggest that macrophage-specific deletion of
Adrb2 leads to the recruitment of more Ly6C
negCD11c
neg macrophages, which we hypothesize could be anti-angiogenic.